SearchUser loginOffice of CitizenRest in Peace,
Who's new
|
EPA Report: 22 Million Cataract Cases Will Be Prevented by Stronger Ozone Layer ProtectionSubmitted by Norm Roulet on Fri, 07/30/2010 - 13:49.
WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency marked the beginning of Cataract Awareness Month by announcing a new peer-reviewed report predicting that more than 22 million additional cataract cases will be avoided for Americans born between 1985 and 2100 due to the Montreal Protocol. The environmental treaty, signed by 196 countries, was designed to reduce and eventually eliminate ozone depleting substances. Too much UV radiation not only increases the risk for skin cancer, but also increases the risk for cataracts -- a clouding of the eye’s lens that affects more than 20 million Americans age 40 and older. “Since the 1970s, we have prevented millions of skin cancer cases and deaths through our work protecting the ozone layer,” said Gina McCarthy, assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation. “I am excited to kick off Cataract Awareness Month by announcing that the science has now enabled us to estimate our impact on cataracts.” Due to the success of the Montreal Protocol, the ozone layer is predicted to recover to pre-1980 levels after 2065. In the meantime, under a compromised ozone layer, more ultraviolet (UV) radiation reaches the Earth’s surface. While treatment for cataracts is widely available in the U.S., the costs are high, with direct medical costs estimated to be $6.8 billion per year. For the first time, EPA is able to include data on cataract risk by gender and skin type in the report. However, all people, regardless of gender and skin type, are at risk for cataracts. This is why it is important for adults and children to use eyewear that absorbs UV rays and to wear a wide-brimmed hat. The following changes in vision may be signs of cataracts: · Blurred vision, double vision, ghost images, the sense of a "film" over the eyes · Lights seem too dim for reading or close-up work, or feeling "dazzled" by strong light · Changing eyeglass prescriptions often, and the change does not seem to help.
Information on the report: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/science/effects/index.html.
More information on eye damage: http://www.epa.gov/sunwise/doc/eyedamage.pdf.
More information on the Montreal Protocol: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/intpol/
R260 Note: If a link above doesn't work, please copy and paste the URL into a browser. View all news releases related to air issues
BP Oil Spill Response: Web site | Get email updates
CONTACT: Dave Ryan Ryan [dot] dave [at] epa [dot] gov 202-564-7827 202-564-4355
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE July 30, 2010
PROTECTING THE OZONE LAYER PROTECTS EYESIGHT - A REPORT ON CATARACT INCIDENCE IN THE UNITED STATES USING THE ATMOSPHERIC AND HEALTH EFFECTS FRAMEWORK MODEL Prepared for: Stratospheric Protection Division - Office of Air and Radiation - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Washington, D.C. 20460 Prepared by: ICF International, 1725 Eye Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006 July 30, 2010 Executive Summary Human-made ozone-depleting substances (ODS) such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), halons, methyl bromide, and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) reduce the ozone concentration in the Earth’s stratosphere. The ozone layer acts like a protective shield, so damage to it significantly increases the amount of ultraviolet (UV) radiation reaching the Earth’s surface. More UV means more adverse human health effects, like skin cancer and cataract. The 1987 Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (Montreal Protocol) is an international agreement in which governments have acknowledged the harm and agreed to phase out production and import of specific ODS. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) uses the Atmospheric and Health Effects Framework (AHEF) to assess the human health benefits in the U.S. associated with reducing emissions of ODS under the Montreal Protocol and its amendments and adjustments. Previously, the AHEF estimated the skin cancer cases and deaths avoided. This report shows that the AHEF now has the capability to model avoided cataract cases. The updates that enabled AHEF to model cataract incidence include: EPA uses AHEF to examine how health effects change under different ODS control policy scenarios either relative to the 1979-1980 baseline, or compared to one another. For example, this report estimates that the strengthening of the original Montreal Protocol through the Montreal Amendments of 1997 will result in more than 22 million additional new cataract cases avoided for Americans born between 1985 and 2100. This finding illustrates how reducing ODS leads to increases in stratospheric ozone concentrations, thereby reducing cataract incidence. The results further demonstrate two trends when comparing less protective policies for protecting the ozone layer to more protective policies. First, U.S. counties with many residents older than age 55 have a demonstrably higher cataract incidence than neighboring counties with fewer residents over age 55. Second, because ozone depletion occurs more significantly at higher latitudes, residents of northern counties experience a higher relative increase in exposure to UV radiation than do residents of southern counties. The sensitivity analysis found that changing the biological amplification factor (BAF) as a function of skin type and gender was not highly influential. Overall, the BAFs -- the dose-response relationship between UV radiation intensity and cataract cases caused -- were the greatest source of uncertainty, followed by the choice of action spectrum that relates UV exposure to incidence of cataract. EPA plans additional updates to AHEF to further improve its capabilities. The emissions scenarios will be updated to reflect current assumptions regarding ODS emissions estimates, including the development of a new emission scenario that represents the Montreal Protocol as adjusted in 2007 and to calculate the health benefits associated with this more aggressive phase out of HCFCs. EPA may also examine avoided costs, and may be able to enhance the model’s exposure estimates considering behavior, solar zenith angle, and age.
( categories:
|
Recent comments
Popular contentToday's:All time:Last viewed:
|