Demolition May Raise Mesothelioma Risk
The above property located at 6808 Lorain Avenue in Cleveland, Ohio was demolished on October 15, 2013. Approximately one week prior to the demolition, two EPA inspectors were at the property collecting samples to test for asbestos. One of the EPA inspectors stated that the floor tile was definetely asbestos, and placed a piece of the tile in a clear bag for further testing prior to the demolition. The other EPA inspector sat in his car for approximately one hour playing around on his cell phone- laughing with the other party on his phone. The EPA inspector who collected the asbestos sample stated that the demolition would take place in approximately one month and would require costly asbestos removal. No asbestos removal was made on this property which was demolished within days of the EPA asbestos inspection.
Why bother to test for asbestos by sending two inspectors to the property, when no asbestos would be removed anyway?
The historic John Marshal school was also demolished minus any asbestos removal, according to Satinder P. S. Puri:
Photo courtesty of Satinder P.S. Puri
It is a known FACT that asbestos dust causes fatal Mesothelioma.
The Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [2] (EPA), in response to allegations that the Agency has authorized the use of unapproved methods to demolish buildings containing asbestos, has issued a warning reiterating previous findings that “asbestos is a human carcinogen with no safe level of exposure.” Inspector General Arthur A. Elkins Jr. adds, “Asbestos exposure can lead to serious diseases such as asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma [3].”
Mesothelioma and other respiratory diseases result when asbestos is improperly managed. When asbestos fibers and dust become airborne they can put pedestrians and residents occupying areas near a demolition project at high risk of contracting a deadly, asbestos-related illnesses [4]. http://www.mesorfa.info/epa-inspector-general-says-asbestos-at-all-levels-causes-mesothelioma/ [1]
What is particularly disturbing is that asbestos exposure—which is prevalent among demolition crews—causes 90% of the cases of mesothelioma. Also of concern is that symptoms may not appear until decades later—in some instances fifty years. http://clarklawnj.com/mesothelioma-and-demolition-workers/ [5]
What is Mesothelioma:
Mesothelioma Definition
Demolition May Raise Mesothelioma Risk
Do not take the dangers of asbestos for granted.
That warning comes directly from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) which admits to having done exactly that when it experimented with relaxing some of its own regulations for safe asbestos handling. EPA began regulating asbestos use after the material was linked to mesothelioma [11] and a range of other health problems in the 1960’s. Airborne asbestos fibers can lodge in the lungs, triggering mesothelioma even decades after exposure.
Despite the danger, beginning in 1999, EPA considered alternative methods to “augment” the Asbestos National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, the act that governs asbestos handling during demolition. The alternative methods considered, including the Fort Worth Method and the Alternative Asbestos Control Method, leave some or all of the asbestos-containing material in place and allow demotion equipment to shred it. The material is wetted during demotion in an attempt to limit the release of fibers and lower the risk of mesothelioma.
But, in the recent statement, EPA Inspector General Arthur A. Elkins, Jr. said such methods still have the potential to stir up airborne asbestos and should, therefore, not have been considered. EPA’s Office of Research and Development ended the research project in July 2011 but apparently not all contractors have heard the message.
“Our preliminary research indicates that unapproved methods are currently being used or considered at multiple sites,” wrote Elkins in the statement. “The use of unapproved methods is counter to EPA regulations and… may jeopardize the health and safety of the public.” http://www.survivingmesothelioma.com/news/view.asp?ID=001207#.UpR7xsRDs40 [12]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The land bank is willing to jeopardize the health and safety of the public by continuing their demolition crusade- minus asbestos removal- in order to profit demolition contractor buddies.
Residents near Demolished School Building Can File Asbestos Lawsuit
Though the council chiefs argue that only very low levels of dangerous asbestos fibers were detected, a lawfirm criticizes them. “Numerous individuals are dying in the city due to asbestos hazard. But they are just not aware of it still,” the lawfirm said. “Asbestos material is actually a silent executioner. Inhalation of even extremely low levels of the stuff can cause severe health impacts later,” Gordon said. http://mesotheliomasurvivalrate.com/mesothelioma-blog/?p=320 [13]
A few years ago, I lost a friend who was in her 40's. She died from Mesothelmioa which was caused by asbestos dust brought into her childhood home by her father who was a pipefitter.
There have seen several other deaths contributed to the same issue:
Indirect Asbestos Exposure From Washing Husband’s Clothes Leads to Woman’s Mesothelioma Diagnosis and Death
Asbestos Dust on Husband’s Work Clothes Causes Wife’s Death From Mesothelioma http://www.asbestos-mesothelioma.com/indirect-asbestos-mesothelioma-secondary-exposure-asbestos-dust-clothing-washing-workers-wife/ [15]
Killed by a cuddle from her dad: Asbestos dust on work clothes led to daughter's death http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/killed-by-a-cuddle-from-her-dad-asbestos-dust-776384 [16] |
The above are only a FEW examples of deaths caused by asbestos dust. It is common sense that demolitions on older buildings - which all contain asbestos- is a threat to the health of our community.
DETROIT — A man who authorities said took a shortcut while demolishing a warehouse in Dearborn last year has landed in federal prison.
Khalil Mahmoud Saad, 40, of Dearborn was sentenced to 14 months in federal prison Tuesday by U.S. District Judge Paul Borman for violating the Clean Air Act.
Saad was hired in November 2011 to demolish a vacant commercial warehouse at 10401 Ford Road, just west of Wyoming, and dispose of the debris. He hired an asbestos consultant who identified more than 1,000 linear feet of pipe insulation that contained asbestos and more of the same on a large boiler.
Federal law says that all asbestos must be properly removed before any activity that would break up, dislodge or otherwise disturb it.
Authorities said Saad hired workers in April 2012 to tear down the building and didn’t wet the asbestos so it wouldn’t go into the air.
“Exposure to asbestos can lead to serious, even fatal, diseases, and unsafe asbestos removal and demolition practices put the health of both the workers and the public at risk,” said Randall Ashe, special agent in charge of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s criminal investigation division in Chicago. “For that reason, it is critical that those in charge of demolition operations strictly comply with the federal asbestos laws. The defendant chose to ignore those legal requirements, potentially putting others at risk.”
http://www.pressandguide.com/articles/2013/11/22/news/doc528e7ef95dd0e857071618.txt [19]
Asbestos abatement costs slow Ohio demolition plans
The foreclosure crisis in Ohio triggered the abandonment of a huge number of old homes and buildings, many in disrepair. To curb urban blight and reclaim neighborhoods, the state’s cities and towns want to demolish some of them. However, many of those structures are riddled with asbestos, which means they can't simply be knocked down.
Before 1980, many homes and buildings were constructed with asbestos-containing products. Even though asbestos was banned for many construction uses in 1978, the law left an opening for existing materials in stock to be used up. As a result, houses and buildings continued to be built using some asbestos-containing materials.
For that reason, the abandoned and dilapidated Ohio homes will require a fairly serious investment in asbestos removal before they will be safe for the wrecking ball. This is because certain methods of applying asbestos result in what is known as friable applications. When such building materials are disturbed they release asbestos dust and fibers into the air that can be inhaled. Asbestos exposure is the cause of mesothelioma, a deadly cancer, as well as other serious diseases.
For this reason, any kind of construction or demolition in buildings where asbestos is present must follow strict guidelines.
Asbestos abatement is a process by which the dangerous material is safely removed from a building before any construction or demolition can take place. For asbestos removal to be done safely, each asbestos-containing section of the building has to be sealed off in order to prevent contamination of other areas. Often, it's also necessary to seal off an asbestos-contaminated building from the outside atmosphere so that the surrounding air is not contaminated.
With the vacant houses in Ohio slated for removal, the asbestos abatement costs are preventing many demolitions from taking place. According to Muskingum County Community Development Coordinator, Sheila Samson, the average cost per structure for asbestos abatement for the first round of demolitions in the city of Zanesville was close to $10,000. Tim Smith, Zanesville’s Chief Code Enforcement Officer, says that the high cost of abatement may mean the city only demolishes about half of the originally estimated number of buildings.
Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine discussed the problem with officials and has a tentative plan to help. His office reportedly received $93 million from a multi-state lawsuit settlement with mortgage servicing companies. The settlement was to help Ohio cities resolve problems caused by the foreclosure crisis there. DeWine's plan is to set aside $75 million out of that settlement to help pay for the asbestos abatement needed for the demolitions.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department of Energy, which oversees the Hanford Nuclear cleanup in Eastern Washington, got slapped with a $115,000 fine for violations in its asbestos disposal. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced earlier this week that its inspectors at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation found improperly managed asbestos in 19 of 22 samples taken at demolition sites.
Based on samples taken at six demolition areas, the EPA said waste containing asbestos was improperly disposed at a Hanford waste facility and there may be as many as 35 more sites where asbestos has, or is suspected to have been, released to the soil.
According to an NPR report by Anna King
EPA fines DOE for improper asbestos removal.
EPA fines DOE for improper asbestos removal.
the alleged violations occurred during building demolitions in 2009 and 2010 when federal stimulus money sped up deconstruction projects.
Dennis Faulk, a manager with the EPA, says the federal contractor failed to document and label truck shipments of asbestos debris.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://mesothelioma-blog-article.blogspot.com/2012/10/detroit-demolition-plan-halted-due-to.html [20]
***Please contact Governor Kasich and the Ohio EPA to express your concerns relative to numerous demolitions in our county without asbestos removal.***
Continuing to demolish property - minus asbestos removal - is a fatal mistake.
Governor John Kasich Riffe Center, 30th Floor 77 South High Street Columbus, OH 43215-6117 Phone: (614) 466-3555
Lt. Governor Mary Taylor Riffe Center, 30th Floor 77 South High Street Columbus, OH 43215-6117
http://www.governor.ohio.gov/Contact/ContacttheGovernor.aspx [21]
Ohio EPA http://www.epa.state.oh.us/Contact.aspx [22]
** My blogs expressing my freedom of speech rights - especially on matters of public concern - are my opinion and not the opinion of my friends , family, or employer **
Links:
[1] http://www.mesorfa.info/epa-inspector-general-says-asbestos-at-all-levels-causes-mesothelioma/
[2] http://mesorfa.org/pdfs/EPA_warning_Asbestos_harmful_December_2011.pdf
[3] http://mesorfa.org/about-meso/
[4] http://mesorfa.org/exposure/faq.php
[5] http://clarklawnj.com/mesothelioma-and-demolition-workers/
[6] http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Cancer
[7] http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Pleural+Effusion
[8] http://blog.cuyahogalandbank.org/2013/11/need-help/
[9] http://gallery.mailchimp.com/65f042f92febba3b6d03cd2cb/files/CCLRC_BoD_Packet.pdf
[10] http://gallery.mailchimp.com/65f042f92febba3b6d03cd2cb/files/OEPA_Letter_to_Governor.1.doc
[11] http://www.survivingmesothelioma.com/
[12] http://www.survivingmesothelioma.com/news/view.asp?ID=001207#.UpR7xsRDs40
[13] http://mesotheliomasurvivalrate.com/mesothelioma-blog/?p=320
[14] http://www.asbestos-mesothelioma.com/indirect-asbestos-exposure-washing-clothes-dust-asbestos-mesothelioma-death-wife-family-member/
[15] http://www.asbestos-mesothelioma.com/indirect-asbestos-mesothelioma-secondary-exposure-asbestos-dust-clothing-washing-workers-wife/
[16] http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/killed-by-a-cuddle-from-her-dad-asbestos-dust-776384
[17] http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/asbestos-campaign/2009/03/asbestos-the-dust-of-death-set.html
[18] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2122347/Mother-died-lung-cancer-caused-breathing-shipyard-worker-father-s-asbestos-ridden-clothes.html
[19] http://www.pressandguide.com/articles/2013/11/22/news/doc528e7ef95dd0e857071618.txt
[20] http://mesothelioma-blog-article.blogspot.com/2012/10/detroit-demolition-plan-halted-due-to.html
[21] http://www.governor.ohio.gov/Contact/ContacttheGovernor.aspx
[22] http://www.epa.state.oh.us/Contact.aspx